IATF 16949 - Expert Advice Community

Home / IATF 16949

Discussions

Top Contributors

Expert

Rhand Leal

4151
Discussions
Expert

Carlos Pereira da Cruz

1915
Discussions
Expert

Dejan Kosutic

365
Discussions

Most Popular Tags

Product: Conformio Product: ISO 27001 Documentation Toolkit Product: ISO 13485 & MDR Integrated Documentation Toolkit ISO 27001 ISO 9001 Product: ISO 27001 & ISO 22301 Premium Documentation Toolkit Risk Assessment Product: ISO 13485 Documentation Toolkit ISMS Internal Audit register of requirements Product: ISO 27001/Risk Assessment Table Product: ISO 27001 & ISO 27017 & ISO 27018 Cloud Documentation Toolkit Certification ISO27001
Select
CREATE NEW TOPIC +
Guest

Guest

Create New Topic As guest or Sign in

HTML tags are not allowed

Select

Assign topic to the user

  • How to comply with 7.1.5.3.1.d

    i everyone,

    We received a minor nonconformity for point 7.1.5.3.1.d of the standard. It states:

    The laboratory shall specify and implement, as a minimum, requirements for:

    d) capability to perform these services correctly, traceable to the relevant process standard (such as ASTM, EN, etc.); when no national or international standard(s) is available, the organization shall define and implement a methodology to verify measurement system capability;

     

    We have an internally manufactured weighing machine that uses load cells. The auditor did not find any normative reference in our calibration procedure. I am not challenging this nonconformity, but I would like to get your advice to avoid recurrence.

    What do you do when there are no national or international standards?
    The standard says that a methodology must be defined and implemented to verify the capability of the measurement system. Do you have an example of such a method? Is this redundant with the MSA requirement? I asked one of our consultants, who advised me to calculate a Cgk. But does that really make sense?


    In short, I would like to understand how you address this point of the standard and what you do when no standards exist especially regarding capability analysis method.

     

    Many thanks in advance.

  • Supplier Scorecards

    Hello , As a company certified to IATF 16949, we are required to share scorecards with our key suppliers. However, some of our key suppliers are accessed through local distributors, and we do not have direct contact with the manufacturers. Could you please clarify the recommended approach in this situation:
    1. Should the scorecards be based on the distributor, the manufacturer, or both?
    2. How should we handle missing inputs, such as:
    • Delivery evaluation for the manufacturer (since the distributor manages delivery)?
    • PPM / quality performance for the distributor (since they do not control the manufacturing process)?

  • Clarification on Laboratory Evaluation Requirements (IATF 16949)

    In the context of IATF 16949 requirements, is a formal evaluation of external calibration and testing laboratories required in addition to verifying ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation? If yes, then the applicable evaluation criteria for labs may differ from those used for raw material suppliers and may impact the supplier’s overall performance rating.

  • Use of a Single Quality Manual for a Group with Multiple Subsidiaries

    Can a corporate group composed of three subsidiaries, each with its own name and legal information, use a single Quality Manual for all entities?

  • IATF 16949 CERTIFICATION BODIES

    IATF 16949 eğitimlerini alacağımız yerler Certification Body(Bureau Veritas, SGS, BSI) ya da Lead Auditor olmak zorunda mıdır? AIAG CORE TOOLS eğitimleri için de aynı zorunlulukar geçerli midir? Danışmanlık ve belgelendirme adı altında piyasada birçok kuruluş var olup bu eğitimleri veriyor. Buralardan alınan sertifikalar geçersiz mi olur? En temel haliyle IATF 16949 Temel Bilgilendirme, İç Denetçi ve Core Tools eğitim sertifikalarını veren yerlerde hangi yeterlilikler olmalıdır?

  • CQI 17

    Hi experienced men

    Could you please share me the CQI17 implement experiences, including: Checklist template, Procedure,...?

    I'm learning to prepare it for IATF audit and certification.

    Thanks and Best regards

  • FMEA new style

    Is FMEA new style compulsary to implement for new projects, previously set up in FMEA <2016 but now transferred to a different company. Or can we continue on the previous set up old style FMEA and copy this after relocation of the product?

  • NPI project for IATF

    I would like to know what would be on a list of deliverables for an NPI project in an IATF-certified organization

  • Controlled documents

    According to IATF1649, if there are documents used to record test results that are used every day by Production Employees should these documents be Controlled Documents?

  • Identifying Controlled prints/documents

    I was wondering if there's any specific way to identify controlled updated prints/documents per IATF ? Is using a stamp permitted?
Page 1 of 32 pages